<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About photosensitive.ca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/about/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/about/comment-page-1#comment-27896</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-27896</guid>
		<description>hello Jordan--

My &#039;beginner&#039; question might be augmented by noting:
Nikon F100, 50mm f/1.8D, Ilford HP5, Plustek scanner...I will be shooting b &amp; w exclusively.

Q: for someone shooting few rolls of film--say, three or four rolls per month--which chemicals (developer, stop bath, fixer, etc.) would you recommend in the interest of 1) attaining a quality image (this is paramount and supercedes all other considerations) and, 2), minimizes wastage--minimal discarded chemicals owing to aging, etc.?

much obliged!

Dean Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Jordan&#8211;</p>
<p>My &#8216;beginner&#8217; question might be augmented by noting:<br />
Nikon F100, 50mm f/1.8D, Ilford HP5, Plustek scanner&#8230;I will be shooting b &amp; w exclusively.</p>
<p>Q: for someone shooting few rolls of film&#8211;say, three or four rolls per month&#8211;which chemicals (developer, stop bath, fixer, etc.) would you recommend in the interest of 1) attaining a quality image (this is paramount and supercedes all other considerations) and, 2), minimizes wastage&#8211;minimal discarded chemicals owing to aging, etc.?</p>
<p>much obliged!</p>
<p>Dean Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Payton</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/about/comment-page-1#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Very nice blog, I will deffiently add this to my blogroll as it&#039;s always an intresting read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice blog, I will deffiently add this to my blogroll as it&#8217;s always an intresting read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

