<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swamp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256/comment-page-1#comment-14986</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256#comment-14986</guid>
		<description>…and I agree with oscar: very thornton (praise that is).
Wonderful, very portable camera the rolleiflex is and the 80 is a great focal lenght. xenotar (not xenar) is lovely. funny, the planar is considered more desirable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>…and I agree with oscar: very thornton (praise that is).<br />
Wonderful, very portable camera the rolleiflex is and the 80 is a great focal lenght. xenotar (not xenar) is lovely. funny, the planar is considered more desirable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256/comment-page-1#comment-14985</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256#comment-14985</guid>
		<description>Stunning. Planar or Xenar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning. Planar or Xenar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256/comment-page-1#comment-13974</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256#comment-13974</guid>
		<description>Curious, the image made me think of Thornton&#039;s ones, then read it ran through his 2-bath formula. Fun coincidence. I think I get what you mean by distracting, you managed to find a very dichotomic composition here... but nonetheless it works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious, the image made me think of Thornton&#8217;s ones, then read it ran through his 2-bath formula. Fun coincidence. I think I get what you mean by distracting, you managed to find a very dichotomic composition here&#8230; but nonetheless it works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minimodi</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256/comment-page-1#comment-13930</link>
		<dc:creator>minimodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/archives/256#comment-13930</guid>
		<description>really good rollei-shots. I&#039;ve just bought a rolleiflex but it&#039;s on service so I haven&#039;t used it yet... cant wait! are you pleased with yours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really good rollei-shots. I&#8217;ve just bought a rolleiflex but it&#8217;s on service so I haven&#8217;t used it yet&#8230; cant wait! are you pleased with yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

