<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moskva 5 Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiplock</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-22416</link>
		<dc:creator>whiplock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-22416</guid>
		<description>Hyperfocal is a calculation of the ideal focal setting for the lens and film format based upon a different ideal then what is shown on the lens itself.  In truth, hyperfocal is largely based upon the aperture used on that lens, and format to get the most in focus.  True the distance scale on the lens is helpful, but hyperfocal allows the most DOF in focus for a given aperture, somehting that&#039;s not shown on the lens front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyperfocal is a calculation of the ideal focal setting for the lens and film format based upon a different ideal then what is shown on the lens itself.  In truth, hyperfocal is largely based upon the aperture used on that lens, and format to get the most in focus.  True the distance scale on the lens is helpful, but hyperfocal allows the most DOF in focus for a given aperture, somehting that&#8217;s not shown on the lens front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emgenov</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-19858</link>
		<dc:creator>emgenov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-19858</guid>
		<description>http://www.butkus.org/chinon/moskva_2_4_5/moskva_2_4_5.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.butkus.org/chinon/moskva_2_4_5/moskva_2_4_5.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.butkus.org/chinon/moskva_2_4_5/moskva_2_4_5.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan hayek</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-16489</link>
		<dc:creator>susan hayek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-16489</guid>
		<description>can anyone tell me where to find a manual for the Moskva 5?
I am a rank novice with old camera.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can anyone tell me where to find a manual for the Moskva 5?<br />
I am a rank novice with old camera.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-14677</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-14677</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need to use DoF Master as the lens itself has a built-in depth-of-field calculator. That is why the aperture numbers appear on either side of the focus mark. If you are set on, say, f11 just read off the distance between the two f11 markers, that is your DoF at your selected focus distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need to use DoF Master as the lens itself has a built-in depth-of-field calculator. That is why the aperture numbers appear on either side of the focus mark. If you are set on, say, f11 just read off the distance between the two f11 markers, that is your DoF at your selected focus distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarmo Virves</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-11237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarmo Virves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-11237</guid>
		<description>parallax problem: take one piece of matt plastic and cover film area with it. bulb your shutter and keep it open. then frame picture and check it from viewfinder. doublecheck all edges and corners. i think that its quite accurate. in viewfinder you have littlebit more room, than the actual framesize is. easy done on the tripod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parallax problem: take one piece of matt plastic and cover film area with it. bulb your shutter and keep it open. then frame picture and check it from viewfinder. doublecheck all edges and corners. i think that its quite accurate. in viewfinder you have littlebit more room, than the actual framesize is. easy done on the tripod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Welcher</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-8470</link>
		<dc:creator>George Welcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-8470</guid>
		<description>I think the main source of vibration and shake with moskva cameras has to do with the ridiculous tripod mount &quot;nipple&quot; that protrudes from the bottom of the camera. This prevents the camera from sitting flat on the tripod plate. Many old cameras have this design flaw - both my other folders have it. 

I made a simple shim out of a scrap of leather that eliminates or at least minimizes the problem. Cut a piece of leather or other stiff but flexible material about 1/8 inch thick to fit between the camera and tripod. cut a hole in the middle to fit around the tripod mount nipple on the camera. If you use a quick release plate as I do you can leave the plate and shim permanently attached to the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main source of vibration and shake with moskva cameras has to do with the ridiculous tripod mount &#8220;nipple&#8221; that protrudes from the bottom of the camera. This prevents the camera from sitting flat on the tripod plate. Many old cameras have this design flaw &#8211; both my other folders have it. </p>
<p>I made a simple shim out of a scrap of leather that eliminates or at least minimizes the problem. Cut a piece of leather or other stiff but flexible material about 1/8 inch thick to fit between the camera and tripod. cut a hole in the middle to fit around the tripod mount nipple on the camera. If you use a quick release plate as I do you can leave the plate and shim permanently attached to the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hovie</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hovie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>Winding after opening and just before exposing prevents dust from settling on the negative as well, the dust gets rolled into the previous exposed frame. This makes the negatives a lot less spotty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winding after opening and just before exposing prevents dust from settling on the negative as well, the dust gets rolled into the previous exposed frame. This makes the negatives a lot less spotty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Haeseker</title>
		<link>http://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/moskva-5-tips/comment-page-1#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Haeseker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha1.localhostserver.net/~photosen/wp/?page_id=39#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>When setting the shutter to the top speed (1/250), which brings into play a very stiff spring, it&#039;s a good idea to hold the body of the shutter in one hand while turning the ring. This keeps the front standard from twisting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When setting the shutter to the top speed (1/250), which brings into play a very stiff spring, it&#8217;s a good idea to hold the body of the shutter in one hand while turning the ring. This keeps the front standard from twisting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

